GLOCK 17 Gen5, 9 mm P.A.K.

229,90 €
incl. 19% VAT , plus shipping costs
Manufacturers recommended retail price: 229,90 €

must be 18+ to purchase, proof of age required

3 In stock

Delivery time: 3 - 5 Workdays


GLOCK 17 Gen5

9 mm P.A.K.

The matte black slide bears the original markings and has interchangeable sights. The slide cover plate, in original size, is also interchangeable. It can be removed, modified or replaced by plates from the aftermarket. GLOCK fans will appreciate typical features like the squared firing pin and reinforced steel breech block. The optimized dual recoil spring assembly, consisting of a main spring, tender spring and rubber buffer, makes for realistic shooting. Underneath, a Picatinny rail is ready for mounting standard accessories. This blank firing version of the GLOCK 17 Gen5 9 mm P.A.K. has a typical funneled magazine well and front serrations. The reversible magazine catch and ambidextrous slide stop lever guarantee quick action and easy magazine changes for both right-handers and left-handers. As with the original, the magazine holds 17 rounds and has a highly visible orange follower. With its steel reinforcement and loaded chamber indicator, this gun offers everything you could wish for. The GLOCK 17 Gen5 9 mm P.A.K. has the same dimensions as the original, which means it can be carried in all standard holsters and can take original accessories on the backstrap.

Technical data

Caliber 9 mm P.A.K.

Magazine capacity 17 shot(s)

Trigger Single Action

Safety Automatic Trigger Safety

Holster type A

Length 202 mm

Weight 726 g

not intended for sale in France

Manufacturer: Umarex
Category: Permit free weapons
SKU: UM311.02.00
Shipping weight‍: 1,50 kg
Product safety information
Manufacturer information:
Umarex
 
, , 

2

4 Stars
0
3 Stars
0
2 Stars
0
1 Star
0

Share your experiences with other customers!:

Most helpful item review

1 from 1 person found this helpful.
5 from 5 very nice

Very nice gun and shoots amazing. Package is good and delivery also good. Absolutey recommended.

>Koen v., 26.01.2022